There does appear to be a pattern going back to ancient times where the ruling class remove that which sustains life and replace it with some appalling monument that serves no useful purpose other than instilling fear in the broader population (that hasn't been starved or butchered to death)
In the case of Easter Island, that fear was of course upsetting the Gods which the ruling class played on We of course note that the rulers since time began believed they were direct descendants of God, so did not share that same fear. But it made it much easier to manipulate an ignorant population and history demonstrates when rulers can abuse power, it usually results in widespread deaths across a society who usually pay for their own passage to the slaughterhouse
John D Rockefeller is widely regarded as the creator of Big Pharma which is somewhat ironic that such a man with an obsession with eugenics should invest into healthcare. Indeed did Rockefeller directly invest into the German Nazi eugenics and master race theory programmes ?
That amount of money can buy an awfully large amount of influence and today the status of virological and immunilogical expert is assigned to people with deep links to Big Pharma like Bill Gates (monopolist and computer salesman) and an array of midwit TV doctors offering medical advice based largely on which pharmaceutical company is sponsoring them rather than any product knowledge or individual academic research of their own...but nonetheless propped up by "peer reviewed studies" funded by the same.
What has been interesting is how a much larger section of the public no longer takes these people seriously and this runs concomitant with calls from leaders like Von der Leyen for censorship of misinformation, even though the same public now regard her and her ilk as the main vendors of misinformation
Looking at events in the UK and Europe, where forests have been cut down and farms closed to make way for wind turbines and solar farms, indicates our rulers have finally lost the plot and gone straight for the kill as they realise their narratives are being ridiculed (though choosing people like Ed Miliband to present them not a wise choice)
As this old clip of unknown origin says, the elites realised time is running out on their ability to manipulate the broader public
Information can always be removed so no one and nothing, AI included, can access it. That is why I propose we spend more time asking where is the information. Then we can analyse it.
Information can always be inserted but it is harder to do, as we saw with the documents about George W. Bush draft dodging last week. It only takes one false document to takedown a whole case.
The elite solution is to say "Trust us, we know what we are doing. If you knew what we knew then you would think like us. But it's too dangerous for you to know".
Agreed This is why the philosophy v science argument must continue Rigid academic discipline can be corrupted and turned into dogma (the science says) whereas philosophy can misinterpret the evidence before it, but at least everyone has equal access to the evidence
There does appear to be a pattern going back to ancient times where the ruling class remove that which sustains life and replace it with some appalling monument that serves no useful purpose other than instilling fear in the broader population (that hasn't been starved or butchered to death)
In the case of Easter Island, that fear was of course upsetting the Gods which the ruling class played on We of course note that the rulers since time began believed they were direct descendants of God, so did not share that same fear. But it made it much easier to manipulate an ignorant population and history demonstrates when rulers can abuse power, it usually results in widespread deaths across a society who usually pay for their own passage to the slaughterhouse
John D Rockefeller is widely regarded as the creator of Big Pharma which is somewhat ironic that such a man with an obsession with eugenics should invest into healthcare. Indeed did Rockefeller directly invest into the German Nazi eugenics and master race theory programmes ?
https://dl.tufts.edu/downloads/5q47s068m?filename=fj236d30d
That amount of money can buy an awfully large amount of influence and today the status of virological and immunilogical expert is assigned to people with deep links to Big Pharma like Bill Gates (monopolist and computer salesman) and an array of midwit TV doctors offering medical advice based largely on which pharmaceutical company is sponsoring them rather than any product knowledge or individual academic research of their own...but nonetheless propped up by "peer reviewed studies" funded by the same.
What has been interesting is how a much larger section of the public no longer takes these people seriously and this runs concomitant with calls from leaders like Von der Leyen for censorship of misinformation, even though the same public now regard her and her ilk as the main vendors of misinformation
Looking at events in the UK and Europe, where forests have been cut down and farms closed to make way for wind turbines and solar farms, indicates our rulers have finally lost the plot and gone straight for the kill as they realise their narratives are being ridiculed (though choosing people like Ed Miliband to present them not a wise choice)
As this old clip of unknown origin says, the elites realised time is running out on their ability to manipulate the broader public
https://youtu.be/a0fiiSUnKyQ?si=5lWyM89UIq3nx0xI
Information can always be removed so no one and nothing, AI included, can access it. That is why I propose we spend more time asking where is the information. Then we can analyse it.
Information can always be inserted but it is harder to do, as we saw with the documents about George W. Bush draft dodging last week. It only takes one false document to takedown a whole case.
The elite solution is to say "Trust us, we know what we are doing. If you knew what we knew then you would think like us. But it's too dangerous for you to know".
Agreed This is why the philosophy v science argument must continue Rigid academic discipline can be corrupted and turned into dogma (the science says) whereas philosophy can misinterpret the evidence before it, but at least everyone has equal access to the evidence